Recruited on a Salary Guarantee That Was Never Paid
A healthcare professional gave up an established practice for a guaranteed salary, then the business withheld pay and shut down. We recovered more than $750,000.
Docket
Jurisdiction
Nevada
Client
Plaintiff (employee)
Matter
Recruitment fraud & unpaid compensation
Duration
Under six months (filing to settlement)
Status
Settled
Case summary
Milan Chatterjee represented a licensed healthcare professional who left an established private practice after a Nevada healthcare business recruited them with a substantial guaranteed salary. The business then withheld pay and abruptly shut down rather than honor the contract. The firm filed suit and recovered more than $750,000 through private mediation within months of filing.
On this page
01 · Situation
Our client was an experienced healthcare professional who had built a successful private practice in Nevada. A healthcare business preparing to open a new location recruited the client to join as its lead provider, and its leadership made a series of promises to close the deal: a substantial guaranteed annual salary, realistic earnings even higher than that, and a facility that was already set up and ready to open.
Relying on those promises, the client signed a contract and began closing down the private practice they had spent years building, making arrangements so their existing patients would not be left without care. But when the agreed start date arrived, the business was not actually ready to operate. The client was left with no income for roughly two months and the practice they had given up was already gone.
The business paid only a sign-on bonus, and only after the client asked for it directly. From the very start, an opportunity sold as secure and guaranteed had rested on promises that were not true.
02. The legal challenge
The case combined breach-of-contract and fraud theories. The central question was whether the promises used to recruit the client the guaranteed salary and the assurance that the business was ready to open were false statements that fraudulently induced the client to sign, or simply contract terms the business later failed to meet. The distinction is important: fraud in the inducement can support remedies, including punitive damages under NRS 42.005, that an ordinary breach cannot.
The second question was the business's abrupt shutdown and its attempt to bring the client back on much worse pay terms. The contract required a set period of written notice before either side could end it. Instead, the business gave a shorter, verbal notice, paid the client nothing during that period, and closed the same day. We treated the shutdown for what it was: a way to avoid the compensation the business had guaranteed.
The third question was who we could actually recover from. The business had already dissolved, so suing it alone would have produced nothing collectible. We pleaded alter-ego and veil-piercing theories to reach the affiliated owners and a related company that shared the business's money, facilities, and control along with a statutory deceptive-trade-practices claim.
What was at stake
The client had already given up an established practice to take this job. If a court treated the recruiting promises as unenforceable talk and the shutdown as an ordinary business decision, the client could have walked away with almost nothing no guaranteed salary, no repayment of the costs they had covered out of pocket to do the work, and no compensation for the practice they had dismantled to take the position. And because the business had already dissolved, a lawsuit aimed only at that empty entity risked ending in a judgment worth nothing on paper.
03. Our approach
How we defended the claims, shifted the leverage, and moved the case toward a resolution that let our client keep their business, in three steps.
Plead fraud and reach the affiliated parties
We filed a detailed complaint that went well beyond a simple breach claim. It laid out each recruiting promise specifically who made it, when, and how to support claims for fraud in the inducement, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, and deceptive trade practices, not just breach of contract. Just as important, we did not sue only the business, which had already dissolved and would have been an empty defendant. We pleaded alter-ego and veil-piercing theories against the affiliated owners and a related company, alleging that they shared bank accounts, facilities, staff, and a common ownership structure with the business. That put real, collectible assets within reach and made clear that dissolving the business would not end anyone's exposure.
Turn the paper trail into leverage
Much of the case was already in writing. The salary guarantee was in the other side's own emails and messages. Public records contradicted the claim that the business was ready to open. The notice and support obligations were spelled out in the signed contract, and the abrupt shutdown was captured in the business's own communications. We built the complaint, and the motion practice that followed, around that contemporaneous record, so the key facts did not come down to the client's word against theirs. Through extensive motion practice we kept the affiliated parties in the case and preserved the fraud and punitive-damages claims steadily raising the pressure on the other side to settle.
Convert litigation pressure into a mediated resolution
With the affiliated parties still in the case and the fraud claims intact, the other side agreed to mediate. Private mediation gave both sides a way to resolve the dispute confidentially and quickly, without the cost and delay of a trial. We used the strength of the written record and the breadth of the claims to negotiate a substantial cash recovery. The case settled for more than $750,000, within months of filing letting the client move on and focus on rebuilding their practice instead of spending years in litigation.
04. The outcome
Settled for more than $750,000 — months after filing, against an entity that had already dissolved.
The case settled for more than $750,000 through private mediation, within months of the lawsuit being filed. That was a substantial recovery and a fast one for a dispute that started against an entity that had already dissolved, over promises the other side denied making.
A few decisions drove the result. Pleading fraud in the inducement, rather than breach alone, kept punitive damages in play and raised the stakes for the other side. Reaching the affiliated owners and a related company through alter-ego theories meant that dissolving the original business did not end the case. And building everything on the other side's own words through emails and shutdown notices made the core facts hard to dispute.
Together, those choices brought the other side to the table quickly and produced a resolution that let the client put the matter behind them and refocus on the practice they had rebuilt.
05. Key takeaways
How a claim is framed can matter as much as the facts
When someone is recruited with promises that turn out to be false — about pay, about the role, about the state of the business — those promises may support fraud claims that carry penalties an ordinary breach-of-contract case does not.
A company that dissolves or "closes" is not automatically beyond reach
Where owners and affiliated entities share money, facilities, and control, alter-ego and veil-piercing theories can keep the real assets on the hook after the original entity is gone.
Your strongest evidence is often the other side's own words
Emails, signed agreements, and closure notices create a contemporaneous record that makes your account hard to dispute preserve them early.
06. FAQ
Important Disclaimers
Attorney Advertising. This case study describes a past legal matter handled by Milan Chatterjee. Prior results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Every case is unique and depends on its specific facts, applicable law, and jurisdiction.
Client Confidentiality. This case study is published fully anonymized. Party names, the client's specialty, calendar dates, and the specific location have been omitted or altered, and all figures are stated as conservative, rounded-down ranges. No attorney-client privileged information is disclosed.
Not Legal Advice. The information here is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this page, contacting the firm, or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is formed only through a signed engagement agreement.
Jurisdiction. Milan Chatterjee is licensed to practice law in Nevada and California. Services outside these jurisdictions are provided only in association with locally admitted counsel where required by law.
Related practice areas
Facing a non-compete or a lawsuit from a former employer?
